Good news from Wisconsin

Tea Party Rally + New Poll = MOMENTUM!

Popularity: 1%

An extremely informative movie is coming this summer – Dinesh D’Souza – Obama & 2016.

Dinesh D’Souza is the author of many New York Times best sellers…and President of King’s College NY .

The movie is produced by Gerald R. Molen, who also was producer of the Academy Award-winning Schindler’s List and a number of other films.

It explains in plain language who Barack Obama really is, what he stands for, and the dangers of his being re-elected for another four years.

Watch this 14 minute video including a brief preview of the movie, which came out in February for CPAC and share it with others.

It has already been seen by over 27,000 people. Within a very short time it will have been seen by millions! UPDATE It has been viewed 1,374,ooo times.

Excellent!!

Popularity: 1%

Andrew Breitbart? The man was rigorous, relentless, and totally without remorse in search of the truth and in opposition to those who would rewrite history to expand and support the liberal narrative. Using the weapons of the left — all media, and no subject taboo — he pursued the illusions of progressivism with élan. Exceedingly effective, his name has entered the lexicon as a verb.

President Obama wants everyone to listen to his words, but ignore his actions. As a propitiator of extreme skill and nuance, he always knows what to say and refuses to let truth and civility get in his way. Our president believes he knows everything. Unfortunately, that is the only thing he knows.

Unless the nation craves four more years of economic suicide, Obama’s stifling regulatory tsunami, high energy prices, and deliberate demagogic discord, the meek and mild on the right will need to learn how to fight.

America must Breitbart Barack; it’s the only way he can be defeated. The left will scream. It will be called negative campaigning, racist, and worse. Knowing Barack Obama and his minions — as we now do — it will be called both. Conservatism will become synonymous with “negative racism” — at least in the written press, televised news, and progressive blogosphere.

Yet if the right wages a polite and dignified campaign, eschewing negativity and “in your face” advertising, the Republican candidate still will be labeled negative and racist.

War is like that. The right might as well fight, or get used to performing sexual favors to earn the cash necessary to fill up their gas tanks, in order to get to jobs that pay less than they made in 2008, if they are lucky enough to even have a job. At least their contraception costs will be covered by the ObamaCare mandate.

It should be learned at an early age that one cannot resort to reason with a bully; it ensures only more bullying. Make no mistake: Barack Obama is a bully. Any man who would throw his grandmother, the woman who raised him, under the bus to score political points is a bully.

Every paragraph written, speech made, or commercial commissioned, between now and Election Day, must be about Obama, his past, who he has associated with, and his mentors, as well as who he is today and what he has done to this nation — the havoc he has wrought economically and the doom he has relegated to the world with his policy of serial apologies and weakness.

Conservatives and Republicans tend to be civil, despite what is said by the left and the “all Barack, all the time” press. Yet the left still sets the parameters of every discussion, led by the New York Times, which now fits all the news into what it wants to print. And it wants to print that everything is peachy and that Barack Obama is great.

In fact, he’s better than great; he is legendary, and we are lucky to have him. The opposition is not just wrong, but evil, waging “war” against someone…anyone — minority voters, women, the economy, or the environment. With no argument to support Obama’s policies, they have militarized the conversation and made enemies of us all.

In 2008, John McCain famously apologized when a supporter repeatedly used the president’s middle name during an introduction. There can be no apologies this time around. Every TV commercial should start out with the words: Barack Hussein Obama. Especially now, with Iran provoking war and Jewish people everywhere nervous about Barack’s penchant for leading from behind.

Until now, the right has been forced to play defense on progressive terms, fighting not to lose, instead of to win — politically, leading from behind. It’s the way John McCain campaigned, and it will guarantee a loss in November. There is no room for civility in this election battle. This is not a game — we are fighting for our children and the future of America, the last, best hope for humanity.

Obama the Great will not play nice; he will be brutal and negative — he’s never been anything but negative. Should he choose to pretend he is not, lackeys on the left will take up the slack.

Many voters will pick Obama, regardless of what he does. These people could come home from work to discover the president beating their mother to death with his Nobel Prize medal, and they would still vote for him.

It’s not them we are after. It’s the guy barely paying his mortgage, whose home has lost value, hurt by the price of gasoline and making less than he was before hope and change. Formerly comfortable — before Barack — but now everything has changed. He now hopes to be able to pay off his house and retire five years after his death.

He may belong to a party, but he does not have any particular party loyalty — he is too busy trying to survive to pay much attention to politics. He gets most of his information from the legacy media, which is so in bed with Barack that for its acolytes, every day should be a walk of shame.

He is not the right, or the left, and he is not the middle. He is an American. He will listen, and he will vote — conservatives must say something that resonates. It is not that he is uniformed as much as that he is misinformed — he simply needs to be informed. That is the task at hand. Playing prevent-defense will not do. The eventual candidate needs to attack, attack, attack…it’s the only way to win.

Television commercials should be the weapon of choice in the war against Barack. This election season, there will be little positive spin for the Republican candidate in the liberal press. There is conservative media, but it shrinks in comparison to the plethora of progressive media, and it is primarily preaching to the choir.

The fatuity of Barack Obama is there for all to see — yet mass media members are still perfervid in maintaining the man is a genius. Conservatives need to accept that all coverage of their candidate will reflect this delusion.

Run commercials during NFL games, the World Series, or The X Factor, and people will hear the message — otherwise, it will be lost in the cacophony of cultish Obama-worship. The media will make sure of that.

The expiry of Barack Obama’s inchoate presidency cannot come soon enough. Conservatives need to help it along by telling people the truth about Barack Obama — with Breitbart aggressiveness.

In 2008, Obama sold hope and change in commercials that were everywhere. This year, thanks to Citizens United, there will be parity in campaign war chests, empowering citizens to unite against the abomination that is this president.

Spike Lee was right — America will be defined as pre-Barack and post-Barack — but not in the way he intended. We are on the cusp of history, the dawn of a new age, the epoch of post-Barack prosperity, post-progressivism and post-”post-Americanism.”

We must chase this president from office before he destroys us all — and it is not enough to beat him in November. He must be driven from any position of influence. He must be relegated to unimportance and irrelevance. Can there be a more apt fate for a narcissistic tyrant?

Let him vacation and play golf; those are the only things he’s good at anyway.

Email| Print| 153 Comments|Facebook| Twitter| Share

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/03/breitbart_barack.html#ixzz1pE09PHBk

Popularity: 1%

We had an eventful couple of days in Wisconsin between braving an old fashioned mid-west snow storm and debating Wisconsin Democratic Party communications director Graeme Zalinski.

Between the two, we are still trying to figure out which one blew the most air.

We have been warning you that our opposition in the Recall can not stand on the facts because the truth is not on their side.  The only thing that they can resort to is banging pots and pans and screaming their tired stereotypes and lies.

But even we were shocked by the behavior and disrespect that Wisconsin Democratic Party communications director Graeme Zalinski showed to our chairman Amy Kremer on Wisconsin Public Television’s Here and Now.

The lies that he said were offensive, but the condescending way in which he said it was even worse – video to come shortly.

Here are a few samples that give you a taste of his rude behavior and lies:

“Its shocking that this governor would embrace these out-of-state corporate extremists like the Tea Party, people with southern drawls from confederate states (a reference to Amy being from Atlanta)”

When Amy was asked a question by the moderator and it was her turn to speak, he just kept yelling:

“Well Yee-haw”

“Get out of our state, get out of our state!”

We have seen some heated debates about ideology, but never have we seen someone that claims to be a professional act so immaturely, offensively and with such a lack of respect for another human.

After his performance on the program, things got worse when he went to Twitter and said:

Graeme Zielinski (@gjzielinski) 3/2/12 2:04 PM How offensive that @GovWalker is bringing crazies from the Confederate states up here to meddle in our elections. .

Graeme Zielinski (@gjzielinski) 2/29/12 8:44 AM @GovWalker‘s Tea Party group sure loves the “N” Word. Must be the @WisGOP nod to Black History Month.

If you are as upset as we are about this type of behavior and want to help us defeat people like this and the cause they represent, please send a message by making a contribution today.

We can not let the left get away with stuff like this, it is unacceptable!

As always, if you prefer, you may also make a contribution via mail, by sending a check to:
Tea Party Express 8795 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 103 Sacramento, CA 95826-3720

Popularity: 1%

WHAT’S THEIR PROBLEM WITH ROMNEY?

February 22, 2012

As governor of one of the most liberal states in the union, Mitt Romney did something even Ronald Reagan didn’t do as governor of California: He balanced the budget without raising taxes.

Romney became deeply pro-life as governor of the aforementioned liberal state and vetoed an embryonic stem cell bill. (Meanwhile, Newt Gingrich lobbied President George W. Bush to allow embryonic stem cell research.)

Romney’s approach to illegal immigration in Massachusetts resembled what Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona is doing today, making her a right-wing heroine.

Romney pushed the conservative alternative to national health care that, had it been adopted in the 49 other states, would have killed Obamacare in the crib by solving the health insurance problem at the state level.

Unlike actual Establishment candidates, Romney has never worked in Washington, much less spent his entire life as a professional politician. He’s had a Midas touch with every enterprise he has ever run, including Bain Capital, the Olympics and Massachusetts.

The chestnut about Mitt Romney being pushed on unsuspecting conservatives by “the Establishment” is the exact opposite of the truth. The Establishment, by any sensible definition, is virulently opposed to Romney — and for completely contradictory reasons.

The entire NFM (non-Fox media) hate Romney because he is the only candidate who stands a chance of beating Obama.

Meanwhile, many of the pillars of the conservative establishment also implacably oppose Romney. Fox News is neutral, but its second-highest-rated host, Sean Hannity, is anti-Romney — though endorsing no one — as is prominent Fox News contributor Sarah Palin — who has also offered herself up as a possible presidential nominee at a contested convention. (Wouldn’t a former candidate for vice president on a major party’s ticket be part of the Establishment?)

The No. 1 conservative talk-radio host in America, Rush Limbaugh, is critical of Romney, and another top conservative talk-radio host, Mark Levin, is adamantly against Romney — though both Limbaugh and Levin supported Romney as the conservative alternative to John McCain in 2008, and Romney has only gotten better since then.

Purely to hurt Romney, the Iowa Republican Party fiddled with the vote tally to take Romney’s victory away from him and give it to Rick Santorum — even though the “official count” was missing eight precincts. Isn’t the party apparatus of a state considered part of the Establishment?

I’m not sure what part of the Establishment supports Romney. Is it Romney supporter Christine O’Donnell, erstwhile tea party candidate for the U.S. Senate from Delaware? Am I the face of the Establishment? (If so, the country is going to be just fine.)

I would think that the pristine example of the Republican Establishment is Weekly Standard editor and Fox News contributor Bill Kristol. But he wants anybody but Romney, even proposing that we choose someone not running by means of a contested convention.

Who are we trying to get nominated in a contested convention, anyway?

Without having seen this mystery candidate in action, how do we know he won’t be another Rick Perry? You’ll recall that Perry was the dream candidate until we saw him talk.

In 2008, Romney was enthusiastically supported not only by Limbaugh and Levin, but also by Sean Hannity, Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, Laura Ingraham, Michael Savage and many others who now seem to view Romney as a closet liberal. This is especially baffling because there is no liberal candidate in the Republican primary this year.

Just four years ago, one Republican candidate for president was avowedly pro-abortion (Rudy Giuliani). One had opposed Clinton’s impeachment and tort reform (Fred Thompson). One supported amnesty for illegals, restrictions on core First Amendment speech, federal laws to combat nonexistent global warming, and opposed Guantanamo and the Bush tax cuts (“tax cuts for the rich!”) and called waterboarding “torture.”

That last one was our nominee: John McCain.

This year, every Republican candidate for president opposes abortion, promises to repeal Obamacare, opposes raising taxes, and on and on. Only one candidate is strong on illegal immigration, which is second only to repealing Obamacare as the most important issue facing the nation.

That’s the alleged liberal, Mitt Romney.

Conservatives scratch their heads wondering how the NFM can convince millions of unemployed and underemployed Americans paying $3.57 for a gallon of gas that the economy is improving simply by repeatedly saying so.

But then a large minority of those same conservatives are completely convinced that Romney is an Establishment candidate simply because they have heard that repeated so often.

As we say to dunderhead liberals: What we’re looking for here is facts, not chants or epithets.

But instead of popping Champagne corks over our final triumph over Rockefeller Republicanism, some conservatives are still fighting old wars, rather like an old cold warrior prattling about the Soviet Union after the rest of us have moved onto the war on terrorism.

This strange new version of right-wing populism comes down to reveling in the feeling that you are being dissed, hoodwinked or manipulated by the Establishment (most of which happens to oppose Romney) the same way liberals want to believe that “the rich,” the “right-wing media” and Wall Street Republicans (there are three) are victimizing them.

It’s as if scoring points in intra-Republican squabbles is more important than beating Obama. Instead of talking about the candidates’ positions — which would be confusing inasmuch as Romney is the most conservative of the four remaining candidates — the only issue seems to be whether “They” are showing respect for “Us.”

Striking a pose as the only true fighter for real Americans may be fun, but this is no way to win elections. This is Sharron Angle on a national level.

The obsession with sticking it to the Establishment (which includes Christine O’Donnell, but excludes Bill Kristol) by voting for a loose cannon demagogue or a crusading Catholic who can’t seem to move the conversation past contraception is as pie-in-the-sky delusional as anything dished by Democrats carrying on about “green jobs.”

If saving the environment is the best way to create new jobs, then it could be true that being a hard-core environmentalist nutcase is the best way to appeal to the mass of independent voters.

Similarly, if reducing contraception use, lobbying for Freddie Mac and promoting huge government programs such as moon colonies and No Child Left Behind are the best ways to create jobs, then it could be true that Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are our strongest candidates in a general election.

Of course, it might also be true that dousing yourself in fairy dust does not guarantee that you will find the perfect mate and get the perfect job.

We’re being asked to hand Obama another four years in the White House in order to “send a message.” To whom? And what message? That we’re morons? Message received!

Meanwhile, Romney cheerfully campaigns on, the biggest outsider and most conservative candidate we’ve run for president since Reagan, while being denounced by the Establishment as “too Establishment.”

COPYRIGHT 2012 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK
1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106; 816-581-7500

Popularity: 1%